from http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=203304

From http://www.pbs.org/kcet/wiredscience/blogs/2007/10/climate-chaos-and-con...
Climate, Chaos and Confusion
by Michael Tobis theory and conclusions
We climate scientists often hear the case made "If you can't predict the weather next week, how could you predict the climate in a hundred years?" The answer to the question is hidden in the question. The weather and the climate are not exactly the same thing, and so what you can say about the one and what you can say about the other are also different.

from... http://www.vub.ac.be/CLEA/aerts/publications/2004QuoVadisQM.pdf

see pdf file below

Backward Causation

These theories provide one certainty, that in an expanding and evolving system there is a point where order goes back into chaos. When considering infinity, this would be an infinite state in where the system would fluctuate alternatively form order into chaos and back into order infinitely. Some logic would indicate that chaos and order are one and the same only different states of the same system.

This view would predict that what we today perceive as order will in time fall into what we perceive as chaos.

 either … the human mind (even within the realm of pure mathematics) infinitely surpasses the power of any finite machine, or else there exist absolutely unsolvable diophantine problems. 

See also  http://historyreligionandtruth.com/?q=node/132

Leonard Susskind: Quantum Mechanics, String Theory and Black Holes | Artificial Intelligence Podcast

Free will   37:00  enthropy 41:00

In a deterministic universe, there is no free will, no miracles, and no chance events. Sometimes mental events or "choices" are considered epiphenomena. The classic view of determinism was expressed by Laplace. Given sufficient knowledge of every particle in the universe, any future event or past event could be calculated with exactitude. (Modern psychology takes completely for granted that behavior and neural function are perfectly correlated, that one is completely caused by the other. There is no separate soul or lifeforce to stick a finger into the brain now and then and make neural cells do what they would not otherwise. Actually, of course, this is a working assumption only....It is quite conceivable that someday the assumption will have to be rejected. But it is important also to see that we have not reached that day yet: the working assumption is a necessary one and there is no real evidence opposed to it. Our failure to solve a problem so far does not make it insoluble. One cannot logically be a determinist in physics and biology, and a mystic in psychology. - D. O. Hebb, Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory, 1949).

 The Illusion of Reality part 1 bbc video